Previous Posts

Extra-Ordinary, Ordinary Lives

November 27, 2014

November 23, 2014: Reign of Christ

Ezekiel 34:11-16, 20-24; Psalm 100; Ephesians 1:15-23; Matthew 25:31-46

 

Extra-ordinary, Ordinary Lives

(Ephesians 1: 19, 20 – I also pray that you will understand the incredible greatness of God’s power for us who believe him. This is the same mighty power that raised Christ from the dead and seated him in the place of honor at God’s right hand in the heavenly realms.   NLT)

 

 

A Joke: A priest, a minister and a rabbi walk into a tavern.  As they approach the bar, the bartender says: “What is this, some kind of a joke?”

On Monday, as I was working on getting the web-site updated and starting to put the bulletin together for this week, part of which is to collect various pieces of information, I came across a book that was just published by someone called Michael Horton.  The title of it is OR-DIN-AR-Y: Sustaining faith in a radical, restless world.  The lead-in for it goes this way, “Your life was made to be ORDINAY not radical”.  The promo continues, “Restless. Epic. Crazy.  Every word we read these days seems to call us to the “next—best—thing,” if only we would change our comfortable, compromising lives.  Instead, many of us end up feeling disillusioned and disappointed, simply burnt out.”

It set me to thinking that perhaps in my efforts to encourage a bolder faith within our Pastoral Charge, it is quite possible that, at least some, may have gotten the idea that I am trying to encourage you into some radical way of being.  Well, truth be told, I am, BUT not in the way those words may sound.

 

Prayer: Help us, O God, to learn the value of an ordinary life and to be able to distinguish ordinary from a life to which we have merely settled.  Amen.

In 1 Corinthians 7 there are several discussions around marriage, sexual relations, circumcision and being a slave.  What all these seemingly unrelated topics have in common is a question that is being asked in regards to changing one’s status after becoming a follower of Christ.

The blanket statement that is made, which does need some qualification, is that whatsoever state you find yourself in when you first came to faith, remain there.  If an avenue seems open to better your conditions, check it out, just make sure you remember to honour God.  If someone is engaged and they are having problems remaining celibate, get married, otherwise serve God as one that is unmarried.  If someone is married and your partner is not a Christian, stay married, if they will have you.  If they want to leave the marriage, let them but don’t divorce thinking you can serve got better single.  If you were born a non-Jew, you do not need to follow Jewish rites to serve God better.  Serve God as a Gentile.  If you are a slave, don’t think you have to be a free person to serve God better.  Serve God where you are.  However, if an opportunity arises to secure your freedom then do so.

When we put too much weight on external things in our serving God we are missing a few very important facts.  The first is that God does not wait until we come to faith to begin orchestrating our lives.  Where we are when we come to faith is part of the “ordinary lives” God is creating for us and has been creating for us since before we were born.  The second is that when we come to faith, we have a responsibility to share God’s grace with those around us.  If we leave our circumstances, we lose a considerable opportunity to do just that.  The third is that there is no better place for us to learn the reality of God’s power working within us and through us than living new lives in old familiar circumstances.  And the fourth thing is that God has called us to “ordinary” lives, not the life of a wing nut jumping from one thing to the next.  But our ordinary lives cannot be the same ordinary lives lived by those who have not yet come to faith.  Our lives should be so much more.  The extra-ordinary, ordinary lives that God calls us to is energised by the same power that raised Christ from the dead and seated him and empowers him to be the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

If I were to ask you to give me the names of people who, in your mind, have lived extraordinary lives, I dare say that names of very well-known people would come back to me in response.  From our faith tradition, people like Jesus, Peter, Paul and John, some of the Hebrew Prophets, some of the early church fathers, kings, president and prime ministers, that is, strong voices in political settings, from the non-political world, leaders like Ghandi, Mandela and some other spheres of influence like Einstein and Jobs.  But you know, for every name we could list, there are literally thousands of others who have contributed as much or more to the world and did so in the course of their ordinary lives.  These unsung heroes used their gifts and talents as teachers, friends, as helpers and devil’s advocates to shape the lives of the names we know or even the lives of those who shaped the lives of the names we know.

Today is Christ the King Sunday, the last Sunday of the church calendar and the day we are called to remember that in deed, Christ, the nobody rabbi from a nowhere village in a nowhere province of the Roman Empire radically changed the history of the entire world with his extra-ordinary, ordinary life.  Was he a radical? Perhaps, perhaps not.  You see all he ever did was to do as we are all asked to do – to love God with all our being and love our neighbours as ourselves.  To love God means to do as God asks.  To love our neighbours means to put their needs at the top of priority list.  Yes, Jesus said some things that seemed pretty radical but in reality, he was just reminding people of what God had said many times before.  Did he do some radical things?  Perhaps, perhaps not.  All he did was to remind us of what it looks like when our words become our actions, to walk the walk not just talk the talk.

There is a song on the contemporary charts by Casting Crowns called Thrive.  I like both the tune and the thought it conveys.  The words go like this,

Here in this worn and weary land

Where many a dream has died

Like a tree planted by the water

We never will run dry

 

So living water flowing through

God we thirst for more of You

Fill our hearts and flood our souls

With one desire

 

Just to know You and

To make You known

We lift Your name on High

Shine like the sun made darkness run and hide

We know we were made for so much more

Than or-din ar-y lives

It’s time for us to more than just survive

We were made to thrive

 

Into Your Word we’re digging deep

To know our Father’s heart

Into the world we’re reaching out

To show them who You are

How is it possible for us to live an extra-ordinary, ordinary life?  We turn to the prayer in Ephesians –

Ephesians 1: 19 “I also pray that you will understand the incredible greatness of God’s power for us who believe him. This is the same mighty power 20 that raised Christ from the dead and seated him in the place of honor at God’s right hand in the heavenly realms. 21 Now he is far above any ruler or authority or power or leader or anything else—not only in this world but also in the world to come. 22 God has put all things under the authority of Christ and has made him head over all things for the benefit of the church.” (NLT)

Prayer: Teach us, God how to thrive, to live extra-ordinary, ordinary lives, so that in your eyes we come to live the full and rich ordinary lives you have prepared for us and to which you are calling us.  Amen.

 

God’s Gifts: A Reminder of Servanthood

November 17, 2014

November 16, 2014: Twenty-third after Pentecost

Judges 4:1-7; Psalm 123; 1 Thessalonians 5:1-11; Matthew 25:14-30

 

God’s Gifts: A Reminder of Servanthood

1 Thessalonians5:6 So be on your guard, not asleep like the others. Stay alert and be clearheaded.   NLT

A Story about the not so wise use of God’s Gifts:

During the French Revolution, there were three Christians who were sentenced to die by the guillotine.  One Christian had the gift of faith, the other had the gift of prophecy, the other had the gift of helps.

The Christian with the gift of faith was to be executed first.  He was asked if he wanted to wear a hood over his head.  He declined and said he was not afraid to die.  “I have faith that God will deliver me!” he shouted bravely.  His head was positioned under the guillotine, with his neck on the chopping block.  He looked up at the sharp blade, said a short prayer and waited confidently.  The rope was pulled, but nothing happened.

His executioners were amazed and, believing that this must have been an act of God, they freed the man.

The Christian with the gift of prophecy was next.  His head was positioned under the guillotine blade and he too was asked if he wanted the hood.

“No,” he said, “I am not afraid to die.  However, I predict that God will deliver me from this guillotine!” At that, the rope was pulled and again, nothing happened.  Once, again the puzzled executioners assumed this must be a miracle of God, and they freed the man.

The third Christian, with the gift of helps, was next.  He was brought to the guillotine and likewise asked if he wanted to wear a hood.

“No,” he said, “I’m just as brave as those other two guys.” The executioners then positioned him face up under the guillotine and were about to pull the rope when the man stopped them.  “Hey wait a minute,” he said.  “I think I just found the problem with your guillotine.”

 

Prayer: Gracious God, even though we think ourselves so much smaller and more powerless than you have created us to be, we stand in the teachings of Scripture that tell us you have given each and every one of us gifts to be used in the building of you Kingdom.  And yet, even when we do recognise those gifts, it is also true that we do not use them wisely.  As we take a look at the story of Deborah and Barak teach us the way to lives that are truly significant.  Amen.

 

The story of Deborah goes something like this.

Deborah was a prophetess that lived in the time after the Children of Israel had taken up residence in the Promised Land.  Their habitation was a seemingly endless cycle of victory, pride, apostasy, defeat humility, repentance and then victory once again.  It should not be a big surprise that she is identified as a prophet.  There were female prophets before her time like Moses’ sister, Miriam.  However, Deborah is also identified as a “Judge” as well.

Between the time of Joshua and the first King of Israel, King Saul, God appointed certain individuals as both the religious and civil leaders of Israel.  You can think of them as something akin to the national complaints department.

Once the cities were established, the city elders would sit at the gates and when a dispute arose or a legal transaction was to take place, the people would bring their business to these elders.  Most cases were handled at the local level.  However, once in a while a decision was required that was considered too important for the local magistrates so those cases would be taken to the Judge God had appointed to the Supreme Court, so to speak.

There is no indication as to how Deborah had risen to this office, other than God had appointed her.  But it does seem odd that in a male dominated society the final say would be left in the hands of a woman.  But that is what we are told.

Israel had fallen into apostasy once again, a Canaanite king, Jaban, though his general Sisera, had wreaked havoc on the Children of Israel for some twenty years.  Finally, when they could take no more, the Children of Israel moved from pride, apostasy and defeat to humility and repentance and called on God to help.  God responded by giving Deborah instructions as to how to defeat Sisera.  When she relayed the instructions to the top general in Israel, Barak, his response was that he would do as asked but only if Deborah would come with him.  Deborah first warns Barak of the consequences of the condition he has brought forward and then does as he asks.

Soldiers are sent for and gathered.  The two opposing armies; 10, 000 Israelite foot soldiers on one side and 900 Canaanite chariots on the other, begin to move.  Something happens within the flood of chariots.  In the end, the Canaanite army is defeated with only one man standing, Sisera, who flees to the tent of, Heber and Jael, a Canaanite family living a distance from any Canaanite settlement who also happened to be related to Moses.  Jael invited Sisera in, gave him a drink, encouraged him to have a nap and then drove a spike into his skull.  The Canaanite army is now completely defeated and Israel is once again victorious and free.

But this wasn’t exactly how the story was supposed to unfold, and here’s why.

The army of Israel saw victory because they followed God’s instruction.  Their victory was the fulfilment of God’s promise.  Once again, they knew God was in charge.

Deborah saw victory.  As she stood in front of a 900 strong army of iron chariots, a number easily sufficient to destroy 10,000 foot soldiers and wondered even for the most fleeting of moments, if she had heard God correctly, any doubts she has about herself or her God were removed by the victory.

Barak, on the other hand, was robbed of his victory.  Had Sisera been slain in battle, either by Barak’s hand or any one of his soldiers’ hands, he would have been credited with defeating the Canaanite threat and he would have known beyond a shadow of doubt that God proved through him.  As it was this battle only saw victory because the army followed God’s instructions given by Deborah.  Barak robbed himself of the victory due him because he lacked the faith to believe that God was with in even when Deborah was not physically present which was exactly what God wanted to demonstrate to him.

There are times when God works through a group to accomplish a goal but there are many times when God is asking you and I to step out and do as God asks by without the comfort of companions on the journey.  God wants our faith to grow and mature.  God wants us both as a community and as individuals to know the victory we can only experience when we surrender to God’s will and leave the outcome to God.

Barak was obviously a very gifted man.  He knew warfare and he commanded the respect of the nation.  Barak was obviously also a fearful man – afraid that what he had to offer was not enough for God to use.  He was so wrong?

How about us?  Are we of the mind and heart that God’s gifts resident in us are unequal to the challenges God lays before us?  Are we of a heart and mind that says God couldn’t possibly use me to do what God asks to be done?  Or, are we willing to step out in faith, knowing that we, in ourselves are not up to the task but armed with God’s provisions are greater than any obstacle that stands between where we are now and where God wants us to go?

Prayer: God of the victory, give us the courage to believe you know what you are doing even when it seems so odd to us.  Give us the courage to acknowledge our inadequacy and your sufficiency.  Give us the humility to remember that you have given us gifts to be used in your service and that we, as your servants, are under orders to do as you ask.  Amen.

Standing between Promise and Reality

November 4, 2014

November 2, 2014: Twenty-first after Pentecost

Joshua 3:7-17; Psalm 107:1-7, 33-37; 1 Thessalonians 2:9-13; Matthew 23:1-12

Standing between Promise and Reality

Psalm 107: 4-7 Some wandered in the wilderness, lost and homeless.   Hungry and thirsty, they nearly died.   “LORD, help!” they cried in their trouble, and he rescued them from their distress.   He led them straight to safety, to a city where they could live.    NLT

A Story about Change: 

Adam was walking outside of the Garden of Eden with Cane and Abel when the boys were young.  Cane and Abel looked into the garden and viewed waterfalls, lovely birds, lush forests and fruit trees bending over because of the large amounts of fruit on them.

Then they took a long look at where they lived at. It was dry, dusty with weeds and sickly-looking trees.

“Daddy? Why don’t we live in there instead of out here?” they asked innocently.

Adam said, “Well sons. Eve and I use to live in there at one time. But your mother ate us out of house and home.”

Change is not something we handle well albeit when we are facing it or living after it.

Prayer: God who goes before us, show us the way.

 

The first time the children of Israel had come in near the borders of the Promised Land, Moses sent twelve spies into a land to bring back a report. Two brought favourable reports but ten reported very scary things. The result was forty more years in the desert waiting for those whose security was found in the pain of slavery to die and for a generation who had only known God as their provider to be raised up. This time all twleve spies returned with a positive report and Joshua orders the Israelites to set out from Shittim to the edge of the Jordan River and wait for further instructions. After the people arrive at the Jordan, his instructions are given over a three-day period.

At the end of this three-day period, after the people sanctify themselves in preparation to cross the Jordan the twelve Levitical priests carry the ark of the covenant down into the Jordan River. They stand still in the middle of the river where the waters have stopped, leaving the river bed dry.  The people follow the priests into the river at a distance, not getting too near the ark. God restates His promise to be with His people and to give them the land.

While the twelve priests hold the ark high in the middle of the Jordan, the waters piled up on the north side, the Israelites pass over into Canaan. Twelve ceremonial rocks are then piled in the middle of the Jordan before the waters return, while twelve more rocks are carried to the west bank for a memorial ceremony at Gilgal. Now that the Israelites are safe on the west bank, the priests carry the ark forward to join the rest of the nation. The waters sweep back into the river bed flooding their way several miles southward into the Dead Sea.

This sovereign God, who can part the waters, is a God who called Israel then, and us today, to be a “crossover people.”

Every life has its crossover times – times of transition — nervous times, times often filled with potential disaster. This was a traumatic time for Israel. The Israelites had spent forty years wandering in the wilderness. Every day for forty years the children of Israel had survived only because of God’s daily provision of quail in the evening and Manna in the morning and God’s leading them to places where fresh water abounded. Every day for forty years the Children of Israel had a constant reminder of God’s presence and direction in the pillar of fire and the pillar of smoke. They were accustomed to that way of life but all this was about to change.

From the time that they had left Egypt, their travels had been described as going forward or journeying. The Hebrew word “nasa” is used repeatedly until their journey takes a new direction in crossing the Jordan. Now a new word “abar” – meaning to “cross over” or to “pass over” is the word used to describe the crossing of the Jordan. This particular word emphasizes the decisive nature of this moment in the history of the Hebrew people and distinguishes it from everything that had gone on before. This word is not used of the passing through the waters of the Red Sea. “abar” speaks to something of epic proportions, something from which one can never return. This word implies crossing over a boundary whether it be physical like a riverbed or political like a nation’s border or in a moral sense as to enter a covenant.

This Promised Land was not a paradise, it was not without problems but rather it wa to be the place where the whole nature of what it meant to be God’s would have to be worked out.

Our lives are filled with abar times. Being born is in abar time. Beginning school, graduating school, first day on the job, getting married, the birth of our children, the death of loved ones, retirement, suffering through the increasing complications of simply getting older, are all personal abar times. These “crossover times” are times and events from which there is no going back.  Some, are thrust upon us and we have no time to prepare. Manyabar times come with advance notice or are ones we choose to embrace and we do have time to prepare ourselves, but how?

How did the Children of Israel prepare themselves to cross the Jordan, to make that momentous first step that would distance themselves from their past, from everything that they knew to be normal? How did they have the courage to leave the comfort of the quail in the evening and Manna in the morning, of the physical representation of the presence of God in the pillar of smoke in the pillar of fire?

On a personal level, I am sure they would have checked their gear, their animals, their tents, their families. They probably would have done some ritual cleansing with water. And I’m sure that they would’ve prayed. At night when the tribal histories were told, I’ll bet that those who were in their youth some forty years before would have been at the forefront as the story of Moses leading them through the Sea of Reads on dry ground sounded throughout the camp. These tribal memories spoke of similar circumstances and in their telling, in reminding the people of what God had done in the past, confidence in God’s ability to do what seemed impossible increased.

On a corporate level, under the leadership of Joshua several things were set in motion.

The facts were gathered.  Twelve spies had been sent into the Promised Land and a report was brought back. These people, who had lived in constant scarcity for all or most of their lives were told that there was the possibility of something far greater for them than the circumstances they currently found themselves in and had found themselves in for the last forty years. There was positive potential.

Instructions were given. A strategic plan was created (actually given by God) and communicated to all the people so they would know what to do and when. It took three days for all to be informed as to how this crossing the Jordan would unfold. People knew what was expected of them.

A New Symbol was given: The Ark Of The Covenant replaced the pillar of smoke and fire as the symbol of God’s presence. They would no longer be a nation always on the move but settled in one place. The Ark, carried by the priests would move before them and they were to follow.

An Act of Commitment Was Required:  The Jordon River was normally a small stream but at this time of year it was a mighty river.  The latter rains had filed it to overflowing.  All that stood between these people and the new life God had promised them so many years before was taking a step of faith. The raging waters would not abate until someone stepped into them. True to God’s promise once the feet of the priests carrying the Ark touched the water, the waters were stopped up and the people could crossover on dry ground.

While there were yet many things to learn, challenges to overcome and battles to be won, none of them would have ever come to be had not this group of people who had wandered for forty years put their toe in the raging water, had not taken that step of faith to challenge the obstacle before them.

A memorial was established:  Actually there were two memorials set up each made of twelve stones – one in the middle of the river bed marking the end of God’s people leaving Egypt and another on the western shore marking the beginning of their new life.  Is this not a picture of baptism?

These memorials were set up to remind this people that there was no going back.  A new life had begun.

Summary: This pattern is a good pattern for us when facing change: 1.) gathering all the available facts so we can determine the potential benefits of change, 2.) receiving and following God’s instructions so we know what to do and when, 3.) choosing a symbol of that change around which we can collectively gather as we move forward, reminding us of the both God’s presence and God’s leading, 4.) establishing an act of commitment to change and 5.) preparing memorials to leaving what is known and therefore comfortable and to entering what is new and unknown to us but not to God. This is also a reminder of who God has called us to be.

Change is never easy.  All we can usually see are what we will have to give up and what stands in the way of us taking hold of what God has in store for us.

Two Questions: Do you have an ongoing sense that “there has to be something more”?  If so, is living in scarcity and uncertainty really so comfortable for us that we continue to turn our backs on abundance and a growing trust in God?

Prayer: God of the journey, as individuals and as a community, help us determine to stop standing between your promises and experiencing the reality of them. Help us be the “crossover” people you call us to be.  Amen.

September 28: Third Sunday of Creation Time

September 29, 2014

September 28, 2014: Third Sunday of Creation Time

Genesis 1:31a, Matthew 13:1–8, Isaiah 55:10–11 or Ecclesiastes 3

Work with Me!

Genesis 1:31a– Then God looked over all he had made, and he saw that it was very good!   NLT

Three environmental jokes:

  1. What are the differences between a good recycler and a bad recycler?  A good recycler carefully separate their recyclables, cans, paper, and glass, before filling your recycle bins.  A bad recycler gives the recycle bins to their kids to use as toboggans.
  2. A woman called her husband during the day and asked him to pick up some organic vegetables for that night’s dinner on his way home. The husband arrived at the store and began to search all over for organic vegetables before finally asking the produce guy where they were. The produce guy didn’t know what he was talking about, so the husband said: “These vegetables are for my wife. Have they been sprayed with poisonous chemicals?” To which the produce guy replied, “No, sir, you will have to do that yourself.”
  3. Two planets meet. The first one asks: “How are you?”  “Not so well”, the second answered “I’ve got the Homo Sapienitis.”  “Don’t worry,” the other replied, “I had the same. That won’t last long.”

 

Prayer: Loving Creator, as we consider the world in which we live and our relation to it, help us to understand and grow.

 

In the beginning, God created and when God looked over what God had created, God declared that creation was not just good but very good.  The scriptures go on to say that when Adam and Eve decided to do what was best in their own eyes as opposed to what was best in God’s eyes, not only was their relationship with God changed but their relationship with the rest of creation changed as well.  From that point forward humanity had to work for what creation had formerly freely offered.  Ever since, we have been engaged in a battle between helping creation to do what creations does on one hand and working against nature to get what we want on the other.

Traditionally, the Trent – Severn System was a highway through the wilderness but it could only accommodate small boats because there were many places where portaging was necessary.  Somewhere it was decided to make that river system more user friendly and so small bypasses were dug and locks were installed.  Now much larger boats could navigate this short cut between Lake Ontario and Lake Huron.  Along with the locks came hydro generation facilities.  Over time, for a variety of reasons these hydro generation sites were deemed no longer viable and municipalities were encouraged to sell them to the provincial power regulator.  Many were retired and the power produced by these sources of electricity that had little to no carbon footprint was replaced by power produced with a very large carbon footprint.  Over time, some of these plants have been restored but their dirtier cousins remain.  The dams once only used to make the locks viable are now used to maintain water levels in the St. Lawrence so that shipping can take place as long as the river remains ice free.  The false security that the series of dams created has led to increased building in the flood plains which we all know isn’t working out so well.

In California, the discovery of large aquifers gave farmers an uninterrupted water supply and combined with the weather made it possible to produced more than one crop a year of fruits and vegetables that would not otherwise even grow there.  Economic prosperity ensued but so did the depletion of these aquifers and the result is that so much water has been taken that the ground is literally sinking and now farmers are having to bulldoze large almond orchards and in many places, water is being rationed or is simply unavailable.

All over the world in places where seasonal rains have provided life giving water to farms and communities via streams and rivers, large corporations have moved in and installed water collection plants near the headwaters.  Now those same traditional farms and those communities have either no source of water or have to buy very expensive water in order to survive.  People are forced into poverty and or into living in cities.  Of course, now we have bottles of water.  So what if they are far more expensive than the gasoline prices we are always griping about. The bottles themselves are made from plastic which is an oil product most of which end up in landfill sites or in the oceans and will remain buried or floating for hundreds or even thousands of year untouched by any degrading processes.

When we work with creation we prosper and creation remains very good.  When we work against nature to get what we want at first only creation suffers but sooner or later, we will suffer too.  I guess you could say that many times when we work against nature it is kind of like those drugs we hear about on TV where they offer the possibility of relief from a discomfort of one kind or another and a possibility of a hundred side effects which often include death.

But what can we as individuals or a small community that few people even know exits do about any of this kind of thing?

At the root of far too many decisions is profit.  Profit can only happen if people buy.  If we stopped buying bottled water millions of people all over the world would benefit.

If we kept ourselves informed of government initiatives, we could ask “Is this project working with creation or against it” and then help point out and/or raise awareness of the long term costs.

We can pray that our governmental and corporate leaders become more sensitive to the Spirit of God so that they become aware of the long term implications of seemingly innocent decisions.

September 21: Second Sunday of Creation Time

September 29, 2014

September 21, 2014: Second Sunday of Creation Time

Psalm 104:24–34, Job 12:7–12, John 1:1-5

Listen to My Wisdom!

Psalm 104: 33 I will sing to the LORD as long as I live.   I will praise my God to my last breath!  34 May all my thoughts be pleasing to him, for I rejoice in the LORD.  NLT

 

Last week, I offered three climate change jokes and I will so again today.  But climate change jokes that can be shared are not that easy to find.  Most are either mean spirited and politically motivated or they draw attention to things that are far from wholesome.   The three I found are not very good but here we go anyway.

  1. Global warming: Mankind’s revenge on the iceberg that sank the Titanic.
  2. Global Warming: Sending water to Africa one iceberg at a time.
  3. I’ve just gone around my neighbour’s garden and smashed his greenhouse.  Hasn’t he heard about the effect they have on the environment?

 

Prayer: Loving Creator, as we consider the world in which we live and our relation to it, help us to understand and grow.

 

If you watched the news this week, you probably saw the report of people returning from what was supposed to be a Mexican holiday but turned in to an ordeal because of hurricane Odile.  One person reported, “We had no electricity from Sunday pretty much onwards.  We had generator power for one night and then another night for a couple of hours, but no service, no cellphone and no Wi-Fi,” Another person added there were food shortages which resulted in rationing and when the food was finally gone, the resort they were staying in kicked them out.

What struck me about the first person’s report was it seemed that in the face of the disaster that that hurricane cause, that person’s greatest concern was the absence of technology – no electricity, no cellphone, no internet.

It’s a telling thing.  Last week we spoke about how as consumerism and technology has grown and taken over the lives of westerners, the definition of connectedness has changed.  Rather than being defined in terms our relationship with God, with other people and with God’s creation, now it is far more in relation to technology.  And therein lays the problem – a problem that is not just resident at the individual level but at the societal one as well.

I now that some of you can remember a time when even people living in towns raised chickens, ducks or geese or perhaps even a cow and a pig for personal consumption.  The so called garbage that was produced on their little acre of heaven never went to the dump.  It was all recycled.  Not only that but having that close connection to the various cycles of life made living far more in tune with reality that it is for most people today in our corner of the world.

Let me ask you a question?  Where does a roast beef come from?  The local grocery store, right?  During my life time there has been a shift away from the awareness that in reality a roast beef originates with a cattle.  Many now assume that it comes from a store or perhaps a factory.  Many have never questioned the origins of a roast of beef.  And that disconnect will only grow in the future as population continues to increase and it becomes increasingly viable to order groceries on line and have them delivered.  The disconnected world in which we live causes many to never question, to never make the direct link between the death of an animal and the food on our plates.

There is a cardinal rule that is observed by every animal on the planet save those who eat their food twice.  You don’t eat you meals in the outhouse.  Every animal that is, save human beings.

Now as individuals we would never do that but as a society we take our best land, pave it over, build factories, dumps and cities.  We fill our air with all kinds of pollutants.  Dump our pills and chemicals down the drain and then drink the very same water and breathe the very same air.

When populations were small, a small acreage could deal with most of what was discarded.  Now populations are so large, there isn’t enough land, enough air, enough water or enough plants to correct our life style.  Moving from out houses to indoor plumbing was one of the greatest environmental disasters of all time.  That move conditioned us to believe having our dinner plate and toilet in close proximity was just fine.  It taught us that we can take anything we want and dump it anywhere and somehow it will disappear.

The point is that without any intention on anyone’s part, we have become very comfortable with the notion that is perfectly acceptable to ruin our dinner plate which is the earth with all the things we want to discard.  That is not a good thing.

To make matters worse, as our children and grandchildren become even more disconnected from the realities of life that life has cycles, everything has a beginning a middle and an ending.  We are born, we live and we die.  Advances in medicine and technology are good things but slowly the miracle interventions that are being developed disconnecting people from the thought that if we keep pumping our land and air full of our garbage, sooner or later, we will pay the price.  And it won’t make much difference if it is piled a kilometer or a thousand kilometers down the road.  It will come back to haunt us.

Many of us are at the stage of life when our children have made their own homes somewhere else and we don’t see them or our grandchildren all that often but we do have the opportunity from time to time to remind them of our connection to and dependence upon the rest of creation.  Remind them of the “good ole days”, of how we lived connected to the earth and the various cycles of life that are now so often veiled by consumerism and technology.

We may not be able to affect wholesale change but we can change and we can influence our families, our friends and our neighbours.   We are not responsible for what we cannot do.  But we are responsible to do what we can.

When our sons were young, we had this driving game: Spotting Moo-Chickens.  Of course no such animal exists but we knew that if we were to spot what looked like a cow perched o a fence or on a low hanging branch, it had to be moo-chicken.  We never saw any of those but sometimes as a herd of cattle was grazing some of the cattle would be resting which looked something like a cow sitting on a nest.  Those are the ones we counted.  The affect of this was to raise the boys’ awareness of the world around them.  As we drove they saw lots of animals in the fields and forests that they would have otherwise missed.  To this day, they see what many people miss.

So, I want to encourage you to take advantage of the little things to raise the level of awareness and connectedness in those people you rub shoulders with.   If enough of us do this we can effect change.

September 14 – First Sunday of Creation Time

September 29, 2014

September 14, 2014: First Sunday of Creation Time

Psalm 148, Isaiah 55:12–56:2, Revelation 22:1–5

 

What Is Creation Saying to Us?: Delight In Me!

Adapted from  Ralph Carl Wushke

Revelation 22: 4 And they will see his face, and his name will be written on their foreheads. 5 And there will be no night there—no need for lamps or sun—for the Lord God will shine on them. And they will reign forever and ever. NLT

 

Today is the first Sunday of Creation Time in the Season of Pentecost.

Many Christians all around the world are observing related themes because when it comes to our relationship to the created order this is the reformation that is needed in churches and spiritual communities in our time.  While the compelling question for the Protestant Reformer, Martin Luther, half a millennium ago was “How can I find a gracious God?” one could ask if the compelling question of our time is not “How can we find hope in the face of this creation?”

When we look around, what do we see?  There are wars fought over oil, the Middle East is a constant cause for concern and human rights violations occur on a daily basis.  Canadian and multinational companies place profits over ecological concerns and the health and welfare of the people living in the area.  Aboriginal peoples continue to be marginalized.  Fear has led to the ongoing occupation of Palestine, and the list goes on and on and on.

One could call to mind the 350.org campaign popularized in the lead up to the 2009 UN Conference on Climate Change in Copenhagen.  It is kind of hard to remember that the 350 stood for 350 ppm of CO2 as the safe upper limit for the sustainability of life on the planet as we’ve known it, as the sad truth is that 350 ppm was surpassed in 2008!  The planet upon which we have been able to live relatively comfortable lives and which has sustained the innumerable species and natural wonders we love is actually gone.  A new heaven and a new earth have been created, and while they are as apocalyptic as those of the Revelation according to John, they are not nearly so positive.  And our “repairs” may not be adequate for birthing a new earth with God.

“Delight in Me!” our theme for this day suggests that wonder in the face of creation is both a way to experience grace – the antidote to despair in all that has gone wrong – and a way to inspire us to see that the hope can be found in the earth itself.  Why?  Because the earth as God’s creation is a reflection of the hopes and dreams of the Creator.

Prayer: Loving Creator, as we consider the world in which we live and our relation to it, help us to understand and grow.

 

The readings for this Sunday celebrate God’s varied participation in creation.  For the psalmist this is sheer jubilation.  For Isaiah and St. John the Divine these passages are contrasted to the sorrow of exile or the apocalyptic fear of early Christians, respectively.  Do those sorrows and fears have something in common with our climate fears?

 

How do we experience this delight in creation?  And why don’t we experience it more with time?  One of the ways to do so is to remember who we are in relation to creation.

There is a sense in which we are over and above creation, but only in the sense of responsibility under God.  God created us to be wise stewards of all we see.  We are not supposed to be little demigods, treating creation as if we own it or as if we can do it no harm.  When we neglect caring for what God has given us to tend, we hurt the earth and all its inhabitants including ourselves.

We are not isolated from the rest of the created order like machine-like bodies driven by brain.  That understanding emerged with the Enlightenment and the rise of the Industrial Revolution.  Scripture reminds us that we humans are only one part of the web of life.  We are interdependent not only with other people but the fish of the sea, the land animals and most certainly God.

We are so immersed in the mindset of capitalism and so surrounded by the ever increasing reality of Information and Communication Technologies that we don’t even have an awareness that as these things have developed so too have their own understandings of connectedness.  There are those who are so dependent on their cell phones and other mobile devices that they are often unable to get through a meal or a meeting without checking their email, facebook or twitter account.

This need for connectedness is part of who God created us to be but it has become distorted, warped and twisted so that rather than placing a priority on being connected to God, to other people and to creation, as a society, we are becoming increasing people who seek connection with hardware, software and techy devises.

In the age in which we live, it is pretty difficult to isolate oneself from all that stuff but can we not make a conscious effort to remember that we are part of the created order rather than just beings who live within it?

Did you know that we, that is our bodies, minds, and souls are systems, not isolated units?  We are not biological machines directed by a brain.  In fact it has been pointed out that roughly half of our body weight is made up of other than human organisms, all of which come together in one great symbiotic colony.

Symbiosis is the name given to the mutually beneficial relationship that exits when living organisms who have little or nothing in common work together for the benefit of both like sharks and pilot fish.

Pilot fish attach themselves to the underside of the shark, cleaning the sharks teeth and skin, keeping the shark healthy and in return the pilot fish gets lots of food and ongoing protection.

In our bodies, large colonies of a wide variety of micro-organisms live, like yeast and bacteria, each of them self-directed yet working in concert with each other, enabling us to survive.

I am sure you all know that our bodies are completely remade every seven years but did you know that the pancreas replaces all of its cells every day, and the brain replaces all of its protein material every month, without losing unique structure and purpose. Is that not a cause for awe and delight!?

Second, can we imagine our living, inhabited body/planets being without the spiritual, emotional and physical boundaries we so often assume they have?  We are actually very porous and permeable.  The constant exchange of food, air, water, and microorganisms make us “living” in ways we don’t usually imagine.  While climate change makes us fear for the future of humanity over all, perhaps a counter measure is to become more aware of our dependence on the rest of creation by remembering at a personal level the reality of our earthiness and sponginess.

We often think about being poisoned by eating or drinking something but some diseases and poisons come to us by touch like Ebola.  No matter how up-beat we are, it is hard to keep a cheerful attitude when we are living in a depressing atmosphere or are constantly being told we are a failure.  On the other hand, it is not uncommon to experience our attitudes becoming increasingly positive when we surround ourselves with positive people.  It is hard, if not impossible to live like people of faith should when we are surrounded by naysayers and we don’t take time to be alone with God or to spend time with other people of faith and yet, even in the harshest of circumstances it is possible for our faith in God to grow when we do those kinds of things.  It is hard to be physically healthy when we fill the earth with poisons or contribute to climate change.  Why do you think that city dwellers are willing to pay so much to “get back to nature”?

The Psalmist, Isaiah, and John speak not only of the connectedness of all creation, but also delight in this interdependence.  To all who seek healing and hopeful paths in an unfamiliar and changed Earth, the gift of today is delight in communion with God, God’s Earth and an awareness of that unity.

 

Is Easter Real? #5

May 26, 2014

Is Easter Real? #5- The Cost of Discipleship:

Stephan and Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Tom Holmes 14 05 18

(1Peter 2:9a – [But you are not like that, for] You are a chosen people. You are royal priests, a holy nation, God’s very own possession. NLT)

 

As I have said each week beginning on Easter Sunday, the resurrection of Jesus was never observed, cannot be reproduced in a lab and defies any kind of scientific measurement or explanation.  However, like the wind which cannot be seen, we can observe its effects.

Five weeks ago, we began a series of case studies that consider these effects entitled, “Is Easter Real?”  The first look at two people mentioned in the Bible, one involving a woman that was very supportive of Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and the other of a man who was strongly opposed, Saul of Tarsus.  Next, we considered Simon Peter who we know from the Bible accounts and someone who lived about three hundred years later – Augustine of Hippo.  Both of these men became “Big Shots” in the development and history of the church.  Then, we gave some thought to those on the Road to Emmaus and C.S. Lewis.  Their common experience was that they were Surprised by Joy.  Last week the focus was the New Community that arose on the Day of Pentecost and Mother Teresa, both accomplished great things because they were given to love.  Today, our eyes are on The Cost of Discipleship: Stephan and Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Prayer: Gracious and far reaching God, as we consider the lives of others may we see something of ourselves and something of who You are calling us to be.  Amen.

All that we know of Stephan is found in the 6th and 7th chapters of the book of Acts.  He is introduced as one of the Greek speaking Jews or God fearers that were chosen to ensure the daily distribution of food to the widows was done right.  In our setting, he would have been considered a Steward.

But it also says of him that he was fearless in his proclamation of the gospel, quite the preacher and that God performed many miracles through him.  Just a few of months ago, the Jewish religious leaders had handed Jesus over the Roman authorities hoping to stop the popular uprising that seemed to be developing around him.  But now, matters were even worse.  What started as an upstart rabbi from Galilee and a few of his students was now a community, a movement of well over 3000 and growing.  And, at least in part, this movement was growing because of this man Stephen.   He had to be stopped.  And because they didn’t learn from their first attempt, the religious leaders bribed people to make false accusations so that he could be arrested.  At his trial, two things happened.  Stephen let the religious leaders have right between the eyes.  The words spoken in his own defence were a scathing attack on them.  Secondly, in the midst of his defence, Stephen has a vision of Jesus standing at the right hand of God, that is, the place of honour.  As soon as Stephen tells what he is seeing, even before the verdict was handed down Stephen was hauled out and stoned to death.

Stephen, not one of the twelve disciples, was the first martyr for Christ.  He had seen the risen Christ.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer was born in Imperial Germany on February 4, 1906 in Breslau as the sixth of eight children, shortly before his twin sister Sabine.  His father was a psychiatrist and neurologist.  His mother, a teacher, was a granddaughter of the Protestant theologian Karl von Hase.  Bonhoeffer grew up in an upper middle class family.  His mother taught the children in the early years at home and took care of a Christian education, while the father stayed away from issues of religion. The family rarely attended services.

In 1912 the family moved to Berlin because his father a professor at the Friedrich-Wilhelms-University had assumed. According to accounts of his twin sister, Bonhoeffer began to have serious questions about death and eternity towards the end of the First World War because of the war death of his second eldest brother Walter in April 1918 and the period of heavy mourning his mother entered as a resulted.  By age 17 he had decided to follow a career in Protestant Theology.  His main focus was the various problems facing the church, particularly in relation to the rising influence of the Nazi Party.  By this time he had completed a combined bachelor’s and master’s degrees and began his formal theological training at the University of Tübingen.  Somewhere along the line, he had had what he describes as a conversion experience and by age 24 completed two doctorate degrees.

Too young to be ordained, (the minimum age was 25) he spent a year at Union Theological Seminary in the U.S. where he was introduced to black culture and spirituality.  He wrote, “to see things “from below” — from the perspective of those who suffer oppression. He observed, “Here one can truly speak and hear about sin and grace and the love of God…the Black Christ is preached with rapturous passion and vision.”  He was exposed to the Social Gospel, travelled to Mexico to talk about peace and at various times to other countries.  These various experiences led him down the roads of ecumenism and being a committed pacifist.

In speaking to you of the other case studies, I have let the stories speak for themselves.  I relayed a lot of details hoping that somewhere in them you would hear something with which you could identify on a personal level.  But not so with Bonhoeffer.

In his time, the church was established – designated by the government.  When the Nazis came to power, they used that power to reshape the church.  Bonhoeffer sided with a splinter group who spoke against the government.  Not only did many of his friends and colleges oppose his decision but also the language of his denunciation and to top it all off, when the final draft of the Bethel Confession, a new statement of faith in opposition to the state churches was tabled it was so watered down that he could not sign it.  When he left Germany to be the minister at two German speaking congregations in England, his friend Karl Bart denounced him for abandoning the church in Germany.

His brother-in-law got Bonhoeffer into the German intelligence so that he wouldn’t be drafted into the army.  To refuse would have meant death.  German intelligence accepted him because he had a wide range of influence and a lot of contacts from whom he would report back.  At the same time, the Gestapo is attempting to shut Bonhoeffer down.  He could no longer enter Berlin.  He is no longer permitted to teach.  Then he is no longer permitted to speak publically and as required to regularly report his activities to the police in 1940.  In 1941, he was forbidden to print or to publish.  What was unknown to most people at the time was that the German military intelligence organization he became part of was also the center of the anti-Hitler resistance.  Apparently, he had known of this resistance movement in 1938 but once he became a member of this group and particularly when he became aware of the emerging plot to kill Hitler, he finds himself participating in something that is contrary to his deeply held conviction about pacifism and non-violent resistance.  He did not justify his action but accepted that he was taking guilt upon himself as he wrote “when a man takes guilt upon himself in responsibility, he imputes his guilt to himself and no one else.  He answers for it… Before other men he is justified by dire necessity; before himself he is acquitted by his conscience, but before God he hopes only for grace.” In a 1932 sermon, he said: “the blood of martyrs might once again be demanded, but this blood, if we really have the courage and loyalty to shed it, will not be innocent, shining like that of the first witnesses for the faith.  On our blood lies heavy guilt, the guilt of the unprofitable servant who is cast into outer darkness.”

On April 5, 1943, Bonhoeffer and Dohnanyi were arrested and it is suggested, not because of their conspiracy, but because of long-standing rivalry between SS and Abwehr, the group he works with to be top dog in the intelligence community.

For a year and a half, Bonhoeffer was imprisoned at Tegel military prison awaiting trial.  In 1944, after the plot to kill Hitler fails, a diary and paperwork expose his involvement; he is moved to a prison at the Reich Security Head Office where he is questioned relentlessly.  From there he ends up in two separate concentrations camps.

On April 4, Hitler reads the diary, and in a fit of rage calls for all conspirators to be executed.

On April 8th he is condemned to death at a court martial without witnesses, records of the proceedings being kept or a defence.  He is hanged at Sunrise on April 9th.

Saul of Tarsus was a man who was passionate for God, but his passion led him directly into opposition to Christ.  Jesus of Nazareth interrupted his journey but not his passion.  Augustine was a man with questions.  The living Christ brought him answers.  C. S. Lewis was a man angry with God and the risen Christ brought him peace and joy.  Mother Teresa was a woman with a heart for those considerable unlovable.  Christ opened the door for her to love all those she could.  Bonhoeffer was a man caught between war and peace and somehow, the Living Christ brought him peace in the midst of the two wars he was living.  The one was a global conflict of immeasurable destruction.  The other raged within.  And yet, somehow, his God gave him the courage and conviction to not only live with his conscience, but to flourish because of it.

Do any of these case studies ring a bell for you?  Were there times over the past five Sundays that you found yourself in one of these stories?

It is true that there is no evidence that you could take as proof that the Resurrection physically took place but these five case studies and literally millions more since that first Easter morning point directly to a living Christ.  And this, of course, leads us to one final question.  In all the days since Jesus was crucified, in all the lives throughout history, how is possible to explain Jesus’ intervention if he had not been raised from the dead?

 

Is Eater Real? #4

May 26, 2014

Is Easter Real? #4 – Given to Love:

The New Community and Mother Teresa

Tom Holmes 14 05 11

(1Peter 2:21 For God called you to do good, even if it means suffering, just as Christ suffered for you.  He is your example, and you must follow in his steps. NLT)

 

The resurrection of Jesus was never observed, cannot be reproduced in a lab and defies any kind of scientific measurement or explanation.  However, like the wind which cannot be seen, we can observe its effects.

Three weeks ago, we began a series of five case studies that consider these effects entitled, “Is Easter Real?” with a look at two people mentioned in the Bible, one involving a woman that was very supportive of Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and the other of a man who was strongly opposed, Saul of Tarsus.  Two weeks ago we considered Simon Peter who we know from the Bible accounts and someone who lived about three hundred years later – Augustine of Hippo.  Both of these men became “Big Shots” in the development and history of the church.  Last week, we gave thought to those on the Road to Emmaus and C.S. Lewis and how their lives were surprised by Joy.  Today we are going to look at the New Community that developed on Pentecost and Mother Teresa.  Both were given to love.

Prayer: Gracious and far reaching God, as we consider the lives of others may we see something of ourselves and something of who You are calling us to be.  Amen.

About fifty days after Jesus reportedly rose from the dead, his followers were gathered in a room when a series of events began to unfold that culminated in Peter standing before a very large crowd explaining who this Jesus of Nazareth really was and claiming that although executed, he rose from the dead, proof that he was the long awaited Messiah.  The Book of Acts claims that some 3,000 believed Peter and became follower of Jesus as well.

Such a large and sudden increase in their numbers could have and in some ways did, create considerable challenges.  So what did they do?  They did what they knew to do from their cultural and religious traditions.  They formed a community not unlike others whose focal point was a rabbi except that their rabbi was not with them.  They committed themselves to the rabbi’s teaching, spending time together, supporting one another and sharing what they had.  There is little doubt that those gathered on that day experienced something that changed their lives and that that change was based in Peter’s report that Jesus had rose from the dead was deemed to be absolutely true.  So much did they believe that to be true that many within this group would not only learn to live for Christ but actually laid down their lives for him too.  Many suffered persecution and even death for their belief.

The woman who would become Mother Teresa was born Agnes on August 26, 1910 in what is now the capital of Macedonia.  As a child she was fascinated with the stories of missionaries and their service in Bengal, and by age 12 had become convinced that she should commit herself to a religious life.  She left home at age 18 to join the Sisters of Loreto as a missionary.  She took her solemn vows on 14 May 1937, while serving as a teacher at the Loreto convent school in eastern Calcutta.  Teresa served there for almost twenty years and in 1944 was appointed headmistress.

On 10 September 1946, Teresa experienced what she later described as “the call within the call” while travelling by train for her annual retreat. “I was to leave the convent and help the poor while living among them. It was an order. To fail would have been to break the faith.”

She began her missionary work with the poor in 1948.  She adopted Indian citizenship, spent a few months receiving basic medical training and then ventured out into the slums.  Initially she started a school in Calcutta but soon started tending to the needs of the destitute and starving.  In the beginning of 1949 she was joined in her effort by a group of young women and laid the foundations to create a new religious community helping the “poorest among the poor”.

Her efforts quickly caught the attention of Indian officials, including the prime minister, who expressed his appreciation.

Teresa wrote in her diary that her first year was filled with difficulties.  She had no income and had to resort to begging for food and supplies.  She experienced doubt, loneliness and the temptation to return to the comfort of convent life during these early months.  She wrote in her diary:

“Our Lord wants me to be a free nun covered with the poverty of the cross.  Today I learned a good lesson.  The poverty of the poor must be so hard for them.  While looking for a home I walked and walked till my arms and legs ached.  I thought how much they must ache in body and soul, looking for a home, food and health.  Then the comfort of Loreto [her former order] came to tempt me. ‘You have only to say the word and all that will be yours again,’ the Tempter kept on saying … Of free choice, my God, and out of love for you, I desire to remain and do whatever be your Holy will in my regard.  I did not let a single tear come.”

Teresa received Vatican permission on 7 October 1950 to start the diocesan congregation that would eventually become the Missionaries of Charity.  Its mission was to care for, in her own words, “the hungry, the naked, the homeless, the crippled, the blind, the lepers, all those people who feel unwanted, unloved, uncared for throughout society, people that have become a burden to the society and are shunned by everyone.”

In 1952 Mother Teresa opened the first Home for the Dying in space made available by the city of Calcutta.  With the help of Indian officials she converted an abandoned Hindu temple into the Kalighat Home for the Dying, a free hospice for the poor.  Those brought to the home received medical attention and were afforded the opportunity to die with dignity, according to the rituals of their faith; Muslims were read the Quran, Hindus received water from the Ganges, and Catholics received the Last Rites. “A beautiful death,” she said, “is for people who lived like animals to die like angels—loved and wanted.”

Mother Teresa’s activities at this location became the focal point of a lot of criticism raised against her and her work.  The claim was that she was proselytising and yet there is much evidence that she did not.  She respected the faith traditions of others.  What was really happening was that in her treatment of those in so much need, they saw Christ and without any coercing, many did embrace the Christian faith.

Mother Teresa soon opened a home for those suffering from Hansen’s disease, commonly known as leprosy, and called the hospice City of Peace.  The Missionaries of Charity also established several leprosy outreach clinics throughout Calcutta, providing medication, bandages and food.

As the Missionaries of Charity took in increasing numbers of lost children, Mother Teresa felt the need to create a home for them.  In 1955 she opened the, the Children’s Home of the Immaculate Heart, as a haven for orphans and homeless youth.

Her efforts were not limited to Calcutta.  In 1982, at the height of the Siege of Beirut, Mother Teresa rescued 37 children trapped in a front line hospital by brokering a temporary cease-fire between the Israeli army and Palestinian guerrillas.  Accompanied by Red Cross workers, she travelled through the war zone to the devastated hospital to evacuate the young patients.

Mother Teresa died on 5 September 1997.  At the time of her death, Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity had over 4,000 sisters, and an associated brotherhood of 300 members, operating 610 missions in 123 countries.  These included hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis, soup kitchens, children’s and family counselling programs, personal helpers, orphanages, and schools, caring for refugees, the blind, disabled, aged, alcoholics, the poor and homeless, and victims of floods, epidemics, and famine.  The Missionaries of Charity were also aided by Co-Workers, who numbered over 1 million by the 1990s.

And, I have only skimmed the surface of her life.

The New Community of Acts 2 survived and flourished at least in part because the community acted as the mother of those within its numbers.  They gave themselves over to loving one another.  Needs were met, relationships were formed, training was provided and all shared in the blessings and hardships of their new found faith.

Mother Teresa was one of those people who quite literally changed the world.  She is the perfect example of why we should never ask the question, “What can I do, I am just one person?”  And how did she accomplish so much.  Well, it would certainly seem that the risen Christ was very active in and through her and for her part, she gave herself over to loving even the most unlovable and simply acted as a mother to all she met, helped where she could, clothed, fed, cared for and loved with all her heart.

Sometimes it is said of someone that they were a person only a mother could love.  How incredibly powerful is a love like that.

Both these case studies included lives forever changed that they would attribute to the reality of a living Christ.  Did they believe in the resurrection?  I dare say their whole lives came to be defined by it.

Is Easter Real?  I believe that the New community and Mother Teresa would respond with an overwhelming, Yes!

 

Is Eater Real? #3

May 26, 2014

Is Easter Real? #3 – Surprized by Joy:

A Follower on the Road to Emmaus and C. S. Lewis.

Tom Holmes 14 05 04

(Psalm 116: 16 O LORD, I am your servant; yes, I am your servant, born into your household; you have freed me from my chains.  NLT)

 

As I have said each week beginning on Easter Sunday, the resurrection of Jesus was never observed, cannot be reproduced in a lab and defies any kind of scientific measurement or explanation.  However, like the wind which cannot be seen, we can observe its effects.

Two weeks ago, we began a series of five case studies that consider these effects entitled, “Is Easter Real?” with a look at two people mentioned in the Bible, one involving a woman that was very supportive of Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and the other of a man who was strongly opposed, Saul of Tarsus.  Last week we considered Simon Peter who we know from the Bible accounts and someone who lived about three hundred years later – Augustine of Hippo.  Both of these men became “Big Shots” in the development and history of the church.  Today, we give thought to those on the Road to Emmaus and C.S. Lewis.  In future weeks we will look at other people found in the Scriptures along with Mother Teresa and Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Prayer: Gracious and far reaching God, as we consider the lives of others may we see something of ourselves and something of who You are calling us to be.  Amen.

We know the story of those walking home on the day Jesus reportedly rose from the dead.  They were his followers.  They had witnessed the events surrounding his crucifixion.  They were filled with sorrow and despair.  They had heard the report that Jesus’ body was missing and that he was alive.  Of course, they knew that couldn’t be and that report seemed to simply add more questions.  They were so overwhelmed and perplexed by what they had experienced that that was the single topic of conversation.  They were no different than you and I in the hours and days following the unexpected death of someone we care for, especially when we discover details that make no sense to us.

As they travelled, they are joined by a stranger.  He asks questions and soon he too is engaged in a discussion about Jesus’ death.  But this stranger is very knowledgeable and quite forcefully tries to remind them of what the Scriptures say about the Messiah.

He is invited to stay the night with Cleopas and his wife.  As they eat, the stranger takes bread, breaks a piece off for himself and then passes it.  At that moment, those gathered at the table realize that this stranger is in fact Jesus.  At that realization, Jesus disappears and soon those who had just returned to Emmaus were on their way back to Jerusalem to tell the other followers of Jesus that he was indeed alive.

It is interesting that Jesus’ presence wasn’t made real through the scriptures but in a simple ordinary act.  What started as a day of mourning and perplexity ended in such a profound joy that they set caution to the wind and travelled back to Jerusalem in darkness.

Clive Staples Lewis was born into a church attending family living in Belfast, on 29 November 1898 that included a brother Warren, four years his senior, a Welch protestant father who was a lawyer and a Irish mother who was the daughter of an Anglican priest.  At the age of four, shortly after his dog Jacksie was killed by a car, he announced that his name was now Jacksie.  Later he accepted Jack, the name by which he was known to friends and family for the rest of his life.

As a boy, Lewis developed a love for reading and had a fascination with anthropomorphic animals, that is, animals that were given very human traits.  He fell in love with Beatrix Potter’s stories and often wrote and illustrated his own.  He and his brother created the world of Boxen, inhabited and run by animals.

While much of his education came at the hand of tutors, he did spend some time in boarding schools.  It was at such a school after the death of his mother at age 10 and a later respiratory ailment that he turned his back on his Anglican baptism and became an atheist at fifteen.

In his youth Lewis became fascinated with Icelandic sagas and Norse mythology which in turn led him to Greek literature.  He was awarded a scholarship to University College, Cambridge but was drafted into the British Army and the First World War before he could begin classes.  Between the sectarian violence in Northern Ireland and his experiences on the front, his atheism was confirmed although he didn’t seem to have any trouble being very angry at the God that did not exist.

While a long road, his return to Christianity actually began at age 16 when he read a book called Phantasies by George MacDonald.  He commented that this book did for him what the Beatrice Potter books did for him in his youth.

When he returned to Cambridge as a professor, he met J. R. R. Tolkien and G. K. Chesterton and eventually they all became part of a group known as “Inklings”  It was through the ongoing discussions with this group that he made the move from being convinced that God didn’t exist to believing God does exist.  He tells of the final stage of that move when he writes, “You must picture me alone in that room in Magdalen, night after night, feeling, whenever my mind lifted even for a second from my work, the steady, unrelenting approach of Him whom I so earnestly desired not to meet.  That which I greatly feared had at last come upon me.  In the Trinity Term of 1929 I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant convert in all England.” (Surprised by Joy, pp. 228-229. 1966.)

Lewis fully embraced Christianity in 1931, following a long discussion and late-night walk with his close friends Tolkien and Hugo Dyson.  He records making a specific commitment to Christian belief while on his way to the zoo with his brother.  He became a member of the Church of England – reportedly somewhat to the disappointment of Tolkien, who had hoped that he would join the Catholic Church.

After the outbreak of the war in 1939, he and his brother took child evacuees from London and other cities into the suburbs of Belfast

Because he was only 40 when the war started, Lewis tried to re-enter military service, offering to instruct cadets, but his offer was not accepted.  He, in turn, rejected the recruiting office’s suggestion of writing newspaper columns for the Ministry of Information because he did not want to “write lies” to deceive the enemy.  He later served in the local Home Guard in Oxford.

From 1941 to 1943 Lewis spoke on widely appreciated religious programmes broadcast by the BBC from London while the city was under periodic air raids.

In Lewis’s later life, he corresponded with and later met Joy Davidman Gresham, an American writer of Jewish background, a former Communist, and a convert from atheism to Christianity.  She was separated from her alcoholic and abusive husband, and came to England with her two sons.  Lewis at first regarded her as an agreeable intellectual companion and personal friend.  He married her in 1956 in a civil so that she could continue to live in the UK.  However, after complaining of a painful hip, she was diagnosed with terminal bone cancer, and the relationship developed to the point that they sought a Christian marriage.  Joy being divorced, was a significant problem in the Church of England at the time, but a friend, the Rev. Peter Bide, performed the ceremony at her bed in the Churchill Hospital on 21 March 1957.  She died in 1960 and C. S. Lewis, Jack, followed suit three years later on Nov. 22, 1963, the same day that Kennedy was assassinated.

C. S. Lewis is best known both for his fictional work, especially The Screwtape Letters, The Chronicles of Narnia, and The Space Trilogy, and for his non-fiction Christian apologetics, such as Mere Christianity, Miracles, and The Problem of Pain.  The title of his book, Surprised by Joy actually has two references, the woman named Joy and the experience of his conversion.

Those that were on the road to Emmaus that day never saw the resurrection take place but through the breaking of bread encountered the living Christ.  C. S. Lewis was not present at the tomb either but he encountered the living Christ through what he read, through a very reluctant encounter with the one in whom he did not believe and through his conversations with others.

And so, I conclude with comments similar to those that I have for the past two weeks.  Both these case studies included being surprised by joy and lives forever changed that they would attribute to the living Christ.  Did they believe in the resurrection?  I dare say their whole life came to be defined by it.

Is Easter Real?  I believe that those on the Road to Emmaus and Clive Staples Lewis would respond with an overwhelming, Yes!

Is Easter Real? #2

April 28, 2014

Is Easter Real? #2 – Soon to be Big Shots:

 Simon Peter and Augustine of Hippo

Tom Holmes 14 04 27

(Psalm 16: 7, 8 – I will bless the LORD who guides me; even at night my heart instructs me.  I know the LORD is always with me.  I will not be shaken, for he is right beside me.  NLT)

Prayer: Gracious and far reaching God, as we consider the lives of others may we see something of ourselves and something of who God is calling us to be.  Amen.

The resurrection of Jesus was never observed, cannot be reproduced in a lab and defies any kind of scientific measurement or explanation.  However, like the wind which cannot be seen, we can observe its effects.

Last week, we began a series of five case studies that consider these effects entitled, “Is Easter Real?” with a look at two people mentioned in the Bible, one involving a woman that was very supportive of Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and the other of a man who was strongly opposed, Saul of Tarsus.  Today, we look at Peter who we know from the Bible accounts and someone who lived about three hundred years later – Augustine of Hippo.  Both of these men became “Big Shots” in the development and history of the church.  In future weeks we will look at other people found in the Scriptures along with C. S. Lewis, Mother Teresa and Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Of all the people mentioned in the Gospels, Peter would probably have been the most susceptible to believing Jesus rose from the dead.  I say that for two reasons: his character and his experiences.

In the gospels, Peter is the impetuous one.  Not only was he the usually the first to jump on the band wagon, he was often the one building it.  He was the one that got out of the boat and walked on water.  He was the one to first say that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of the living God.

As for his experience, Peter was present at either 5 or 6 post resurrection appearances of Jesus, depending on whether Matthew 28:16-17 and Luke 24: 49-53 are referring to the same or two separate occasions.

In Luke 24:34, Peter sees Jesus at the tomb.  In our reading from Matthew today he is present at both appearances to the eleven remaining disciples.  In John 21: 1-23, he is one of those gathered at the Sea of Tiberius and the large gatherings referred to in Matthew 28 and Luke 24 make up 5 and or 6.

While Peter’s activities on the day of Pentecost are well known and while he seems to be the focal point of the story in the first part of the book of Acts, much of the rest of his experiences are not recorded for us.  According to Christian tradition, Peter was crucified in Rome under Emperor Nero Augustus Caesar.  It is traditionally held that he was crucified upside down at his own request, since he saw himself unworthy to be crucified in the same way as Jesus Christ.

Peter, underwent a remarkable transformation because of the post resurrection events.  He became a rock solid follower of Christ.

So, how did he become a “Big Shot” of the church?  In the early Church there were five major centers or Apostolic Sees of Christianity because they were said to have been founded by the apostles.  The sees at Rome and at Antioch (in Syria) were said to have been established by Peter; the see at Constantinople (Byzantium) by Andrew; the see at Alexandria (Egypt) by Mark; and the see at Jerusalem by James.  The word ‘see” comes from the Latin for seat, sedes.

As the church became more institutionalised, arguments broke out as to which Apostolic See was the first among equals.  It was Jesus’ response to Peter’s confession that opened the door to Peter being elevated to a Big Shot of the church.

“Now I say to you that you are Peter (petros which means ‘rock in the sense of a small stone’), and upon this rock (petra which by comparison means boulder) I will build my church.”  It is actually more likely that petra in this case referred to the thought Peter expressed.  However, at the time of these discussions, Greek was the language of the learned and the term petros was no longer used and so the camp in Rome argued that these two words were merely synonyms and thus promoted that what Jesus was saying that he would build the church on the man.

Aurelius Augustinus, more commonly referred to as Augustine of Hippo was born in what is now Algeria near Tunis on November 13, 354 of a pagan Roman father and a Christian Berber mother.  His mother undertook to bring him up as a Christian, and on one level he always found something attractive about Christ, but for the first 28 years of his life he was far more interested in the attractions of sex, fame, and pride in his own cleverness.  After a moderate amount of running around as a teen-ager, he took a mistress, who bore him a son when he was about eighteen.  At 19 and a student at Carthage, he read a treatise by Cicero, a Roman philosopher that opened his eyes to the delights of philosophy.

He was very bright and so his father, although not rich sent him off to school.  Later, he had sponsors.  Augustine lived all of his life in Northern Africa with the exception of the four years he spent in Italy.  It was during his time in Milan, where he had become the head professor of philosophy at the local university that he met Ambrose, the local Bishop.  It was Ambrose that took time to answer his questions.  It was Ambrose that baptised him at Easter of 387 following Augustine’s conversion in 386 and it was Ambrose that would make him bishop of Hippo in 396.

About his conversion, well, we all meet the resurrected Christ in slightly different ways.  This hard living, full of himself, intellectual tells us of his encounter in The Confessions which is in effect his autobiography.

In particular, a reading on the life of St. Anthony of the Desert yielded Augustine of Hippo’s final turn towards embracing Christianity in total at the cost of his pending future which included an arranged marriage, a burgeoning career in rhetoric and a privileged life.

As a side note, the first generation of believers included the disciples and the next generation of leaders is referred to as the Church Fathers.  One group of the church fathers was the Desert Fathers who for the most part were very bright and very strange.  They believed cities were evil and they were called by God to live away from cities, in isolation and to devote themselves to contemplation and prayer for the cities.  St. Antony was one for those Desert Fathers.

On day in 386 as Augustine took a break from his studies he heard what he believed to be a young child’s voice:

“‘Take up and read; Take up and read.’” …He continues, “I arose; interpreting it to be no other than a command from God to open the book, and read the first chapter I should find.  For I had heard of Antony, that coming in during the reading of the Gospel, he received the admonition, as if what was being read was spoken to him: Go, sell all that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come and follow me: and by such oracle he was forthwith converted unto Thee.  Eagerly then I returned to the place where Alypius was sitting; for there had I laid the volume of the Apostle when I arose thence.  I seized, opened, and in silence read that section on which my eyes first fell: Not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying; but put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, in concupiscence (which means lust).  No further would I read; nor needed I: for instantly at the end of this sentence, by a light as it were of serenity infused into my heart, all the darkness of doubt vanished away.”

On that fateful day, Augustine met Christ in the voice of a child and then through the words of Scripture.

It was St. Augustine’s brilliant mind and total devotion to Christ that led his to become a “Big Shot in the Church.”  His writings lay behind much of the understandings of the Christian faith in the Roman Church and the Reformers like Luther and Calvin used his arguments to justify the Protestant movement.  We may have never read any of his works, or even knew his name before today, but I can assure you, our understanding of the Christian faith has been affected by this man who lived 1600 years ago.

Both of these “Soon to be Big Shots” had life changing experiences that they would attribute to the living Christ.  Did they believe in the resurrection?  I dare say their whole life came to be defined by it.

Is Easter Real?  I dare say that Simon Peter and Augustine of Hippo would respond with an overwhelming, Yes!

Is Easter Real?#1

April 21, 2014

#1 Stopped in their Tracks: Mary Magdalene and Saul of Tarsus

Tom Holmes, 14 04 20

Today we celebrate the event from which Christianity stems – the resurrection of Jesus the Christ.  In questioning the reality of this event, there are few ways we can ask the question without invoking the notion that all such questions can be only be answered assuming some form of the scientific method – is it observable, repeatable and measurable.  But, the resurrection of Jesus was never observed, cannot be reproduced in a lab and defies any kind of scientific measurement or explanation.  However, like the wind which cannot be seen we can observe its effects.

Today, we begin a series of five case studies that consider these effects entitled, “Is Easter Real?” with a look at two people mentioned in the Bible, one involving a woman that was very supportive of Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and the other of a man who was strongly opposed, Saul of Tarsus.  In future weeks we will look at other people found in the Scriptures along with Augustine, C. S. Lewis, Mother Teresa and Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Two stories, two journeys interrupted, two people, one female the other male, with two very different agendas and two very different perspectives, both on a journey of sorts several years apart.

We have already heard (Matthew 28:1-10) the account of the one – Mary Magdalene, having subjected herself to ceremonial uncleanliness was one of those that touched the dead Jesus of Nazareth, washing his body, applying a few herbs and spices and wrapping his remains in a burial shroud.  There wasn’t time before the sunset and Passover began to complete the task at hand and so the two Mary’s decided to leave what was undone until first light after the Sabbath.  Work was forbidden on the Sabbath.

She and the other Mary set out before sunrise to complete their task but when they reached their destination – the tomb that had belonged to Joseph of Aramathea – the great sorrow she was carrying was stolen by fear.  They were greeted by the ground shaking and the huge stone that barred entry rolled away from the entrance.  What was happening?  It seemed as though the soldiers that stood on guard were struck down and a being not from this world, like a man but so different spoke, “. “Don’t be afraid!” he said. “I know you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified but he isn’t here! He is risen from the dead, just as he said would happen.  Come, see where his body was lying.  Now go and tell his disciples that he has risen from the dead, and he is going ahead of you to Galilee.  You will see him there. Remember what I have told you.” (see Math. 28)

As the two Mary’s ran from the tomb.  They were very frightened but also filled with great sense of joy.  ‘Could it be true’ they wondered as they rushed to give the disciples the angel’s message.  The story goes on to say that “as they went, Jesus met them and greeted them.  And they ran to him, grasped his feet, and worshiped him to whom Jesus responded, “Don’t be afraid!  Go tell my brothers to leave for Galilee, and they will see me there.”

Story number two is also recorded in the Bible.  Acts chapter 9 recounts the story of Saul of Tarsus as he journeyed from Jerusalem to Damascus.  He was no disciple of the rabbi from Nazareth.  In fact he had devoted himself to the service of God in the form of hunting down Jesus-followers and bringing them back to Jerusalem for trial and execution.  As he travelled, “a light from heaven suddenly shone down around him.  He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, “Saul! Saul! Why are you persecuting me?”

“Who are you, lord?” Saul asked.

And the voice replied, “I am Jesus, the one you are persecuting!  Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”

Those who were assigned to Saul to help him hunt down these heretics and blasphemers “stood speechless, for they heard the sound of someone’s voice but saw no one!

So who could we deem to be crazy – just Saul or all of them?

Whatever our thoughts may be with either the account of Mary Magdalene or of Saul, there are several things they hold in common.

First, neither of them actually saw the resurrection take place.  The two Mary’s were the first at the tomb but neither were actually present in the tomb when it is alleged that Jesus was resurrected from the dead.  In fact, there is no first hand evidence that the resurrection actually occurred.  Yet both claim to have met a resurrected, a living Jesus.

Both experienced something that changed their lives for ever.  Little is known about Mary Magdalene after this point in time, but the account recorded in Matthew says that she moved from sorrow, to fear, to joy and excitement.

Saul became Paul and instead of persecuting Christians became one of its greatest proponents, penned much of what we call the New Testament, lived a sacrificial life in the cause of Christ and suffered death because of this faith in Christ.  His whole life orientation changed that day on the road to Damascus and remained so for the rest of his life.

Paul wrote these words, “12 But tell me this—since we preach that Christ rose from the dead, why are some of you saying there will be no resurrection of the dead? 13 For if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ has not been raised either. 14 And if Christ has not been raised, then all our preaching is useless, and your faith is useless. 15 And we apostles would all be lying about God—for we have said that God raised Christ from the grave. But that can’t be true if there is no resurrection of the dead. 16 And if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ has not been raised. 17 And if Christ has not been raised, then your faith is useless and you are still guilty of your sins. 18 In that case, all who have died believing in Christ are lost! 19 And if our hope in Christ is only for this life, we are more to be pitied than anyone in the world.  20 But in fact, Christ has been raised from the dead. He is the first of a great harvest of all who have died.(1 Cor. 15: 12-20 NLT)

Neither Mary nor Paul would ever be able to offer proof scientific proof that the resurrection took place but both lived their lives assuming it was real.

Is Easter Real?  I dare say that Mary and Saul would respond with an overwhelming, “Yes!”